Why may the team not work? - Hidden agendas and blind spots

Teams have their objectives which are supposed to be shared by all members. These objectives are usually in line with the corporate ones. However, individuals also have their own objectives and expectations from the groupwork. When the latter ones are not shared with the other members of the team they are called ‘hidden agendas’. Examples of hidden agendas are the following:

  • Individuals taking advantage of a meeting in order to impress other colleagues
  • Individuals taking advantage of a meeting in order to ‘defeat’ other colleagues for personal reasons

When hidden agendas prevail over the team’s objectives they risk to compromise the team’s success.
For this reason, as managers, we should make sure our team members talk to each other as openly as possible so as to decrease the likelihood for hidden agendas to grow stronger.

'Blind spots' are unfavourable situations where some team members share information about another team member who is not made aware of that. Moreover, the other members are likely not to tell him/her the truth as they may well be afraid of hurting his/her feelings.

For example, a member may not be considered competent or skilled enough to carry out a task and no-one will tell him/her the real reason why he/she will never get the responsibility for that specific task. This is a blind spot where information does not flow correctly.

As managers, we should make sure our team members talk to each other as openly as possible in order to decrease the likelihood for blind spots to damage the team’s atmosphere. Moreover, if a person is not told the truth about his/her skills, this person will never have the chance to improve and will be alway disadvantaged.

As managers, do we care for our team members enough to get to know them and detect blind spots and hidden agendas? How could we practically address these issues and preserve our team's success?

 

 

 

Rethinking the Adaptive Leadership model through the Italian Adaptive Leadership Behavior Questionnaire

Since Heifetz designed the adaptive leadership framework in 1994, the academic literature has benefitted from many qualitative research studies focusing on specific adaptive challenges and how the adaptive leadership framework can be practically used to face these. It seems very few have dealt with adaptive leadership through the quantitative lens and have attempted to measure adaptive leadership behaviors or tested Heifetz’s adaptive leadership six-dimensional model. In response, my PhD research aimed to measure the perception of adaptive leadership behaviors across the Italian corporate context and to investigate whether Heifetz’s adaptive leadership model can apply to the Italian culture. Findings and contribution to knowledge can be read in the thesis: Novellini, P. (2023) Rethinking the Adaptive Leadership model through the Italian Adaptive Leadership Behavior Questionnaire, PhD thesis, University of Sunderland.

Download pdf

Novellini - Hall Italian Adaptive Leadership Behavior Questionnaire

Do you want to measure the perception of adaptive leadership within your company or team? You can use 'Novellini - Hall Adaptive Leadership Behaviour Questionnaire', a new tool in the literature of leadership. This questionnaire was designed especially to be used in the business environment with a perspective on the higher level figures in the hierarchy. However, you can use it in any type of environment and at any level by adapting the terminology to the reality you want to focus on.

Download pdf

 

PAOLA NOVELLINI

English for Work

20063 Cernusco sul Naviglio (Milan - Italy)
Phone No. +39 327 7567601

ritratto paola novellini

VAT ID IT05862700969