The team’s success may be influenced by some external factors or ‘givens’ which are not in our control. They are the following:
Team composition: homogeneity vs eterogeneity. Teams that are homogeneous present less chance for internal conflict and a higher level of cohesion but the solutions reached might not be so effective and creative. An eterogeneous team might go through more conflicting situations because of the variety of ideas, competences and points of view, but it is more likely to come up with more effective solutions to open-end problems.
Team size: it seems that the ideal size for a team is between five and seven members. When teams are bigger the tendency is to create sub-groups for people to work together more closely.
External recognition: it is important for the team to receive a recognition within the company for what they do or what they have done. When efforts are recognised this is a kind of reward that is supposed to enhance team members’ motivation and satisfaction.
Nature of task: the target of the team should be clear and realistic. When a target is ambiguous team members may feel disoriented and when the target is not realistic team members might feel demotivated, all of which might impact the team’s performance negatively.
Resources: team members must be confident about the resources they have. If team members feel they lack resources this will be a problem in the sense that team members will feel frustrated and will give up on the tasks to carry out.
All in all, these are factors that are not in our control. Our top-managers may decide everything about our team and we may not even have the chance to choose our team members. However, it is advisable for us to keep each external factor mentioned above into consideration when analysing our team’s performance, as external variables may impact on it significantly and we must be ready to react promptly to any kind of critical situation.
Rethinking the Adaptive Leadership model through the Italian Adaptive Leadership Behavior Questionnaire
Since Heifetz designed the adaptive leadership framework in 1994, the academic literature has benefitted from many qualitative research studies focusing on specific adaptive challenges and how the adaptive leadership framework can be practically used to face these. It seems very few have dealt with adaptive leadership through the quantitative lens and have attempted to measure adaptive leadership behaviors or tested Heifetz’s adaptive leadership six-dimensional model. In response, my PhD research aimed to measure the perception of adaptive leadership behaviors across the Italian corporate context and to investigate whether Heifetz’s adaptive leadership model can apply to the Italian culture. Findings and contribution to knowledge can be read in the thesis: Novellini, P. (2023) Rethinking the Adaptive Leadership model through the Italian Adaptive Leadership Behavior Questionnaire, PhD thesis, University of Sunderland.
Novellini - Hall Italian Adaptive Leadership Behavior Questionnaire
Do you want to measure the perception of adaptive leadership within your company or team? You can use 'Novellini - Hall Adaptive Leadership Behaviour Questionnaire', a new tool in the literature of leadership. This questionnaire was designed especially to be used in the business environment with a perspective on the higher level figures in the hierarchy. However, you can use it in any type of environment and at any level by adapting the terminology to the reality you want to focus on.